Building a framework for Living — A laminated guide

Arun Kumar

No, this is not an offering for a laminated version to be delivered by the mail person but a summary that can be laminated as a quick reference guide for building appropriate frameworks for living.

It is a cheat sheet that could serve as a quick reminder for the process to follow.

In a nutshell, frameworks for living are required to bring reconciliation between two opposites that we must often live with. This reconciliation is needed so that we are free of inner conflicts. To put together appropriate frameworks for living we need a set of guidelines that can be used as the starting point.

Without further ado, here are three basic ingredients for building a successful framework for living.

1. An appropriate framework for living is made up of activities that fit our contours, be they physical, financial, or psychological. It is only then that we are not constantly distracted from our goal of reaching a reconciliation. It is only then that the framework for living we are going to follow feels like a natural path.
2. The success of the framework for living we built needs to be assessed. An obvious yardstick for a relevant framework for living is that following it brings us closer to the goal it is designed for (i.e., reconciliation of two opposites).
3. Finally, the yardstick should be such that it could be used frequently, and if something is not working, then tweaks in our framework of living can be made until the desired goal of reconciliation can be achieved.

And that is it.

To give a tangible example, consider the opposites of awareness of our mortality and our innate biological need to live.

1. The goal of the desired framework for living is to reconcile the two. Out of the two, it is the living we can change. Tinkering with mortality is beyond our control.
2. If we live in such a way that it feels like we have a fulfilling life, then it has the potential for counterbalancing the disruption the cognition of mortality can bring.
3. The yardstick of success for the framework for living we choose is whether its implementation brings us closer to reconciliation of the opposites of mortality and living. But how would we know that the two are getting reconciled?
4. If they are reconciled it would result in a life that is free of inner conflicts that the cognition of mortality can bring, i.e., it would be an equanimous life. Having that, one day nearing the end of our life we will be able to look back and say that ours was a life well lived.
5. If the only yardstick to judge whether we reached reconciliation or not is to look back and see if it was a life well lived or not, it will be a risky proposition. A yardstick that could be used more frequently would be to assess whether following our framework for living, our days are free of inner conflict or whether it feels like if days are well lived or not?
6. So now we have (1) the yardstick of success for the framework for living we put together to bring mortality and living in reconciliation — how free of inner conflicts our life is, or alternatively, do we have the feeling that our days are well lived and (2) if needed, this yardstick could be used daily. Having these two, the next task is to find the third ingredient for building a successful framework for living, i.e., finding an appropriate set of activities to be part of our framework of living.
7. What framework for living would make our day feel like it was well lived? But first, what makes a day?
8. A day is a collection of engagements. The framework for living to guide our day will be made of an appropriate portfolio of engagements.
9. Appropriate activities that go in the portfolio of engagement are those that fit the contours of our values. In other words, developing a framework for living that is based on a value-driven life can reconcile the opposites of mortality and our innate need to live.
10. Why is aligning activities with values in our framework for living important? It is because then those activities feel natural and effortless. By not being abrasive, and being against what our natural inclinations are, they do not distract us from getting to our goal of reconciliation.
11. So now we have the necessary ingredients — a yardstick — was our day well lived; a yardstick that could be used frequently; and a set of activities that fit the contours of our values.
12. One last note — days well lived are not only an enabler that bring reconciliation between mortality and need for living, but bringing that reconciliation makes staying on the path of having such days easier. It is a nice positive feedback loop to have.

Ciao.

Related:
Building a framework for living #15: Putting it all together